Monday, 27 June 2011

Writers and reputation: when writers review books

Every now and then I go through Goodreads ratings to check what readers have to say about my book and those of others. It was at such a time a few days ago that I noticed other writers leaving one- to three-star reviews and ratings for competitive indie titles. Having worked in PR for a few years, I was seriously shocked. Surely, as a writer one understands the magnitude of one's reputation and the impact it can have on one's career as well as the fact that the writers community is small and everyone knows everyone.

As a writer, reputation ranks almost as highly as skill and novelty. We would never find the likes of Stephenie Meyer and JK Rowling rating a fellow writer's work because it's not in their interest to alienate both fellow writers and their fanbase/followers, who are potential readers of one's own book. From a PR perspective, this is a huge no-no. In fact, traditionally published authors are often encouraged to endorse each other's books and so widen their markets and target audiences.

Indie or not, I suggest never to rate a writer's work below four stars. If you can't give it four stars, then don't leave a rating at all because leaving a trail on the Internet is forever and someone's bound to find out sooner or later and might not take kindly to it.

To all fellow authors out there, we're writers and not reviewers. What you may not like, others might end up loving, hence, it's not in your best interest to insult any reader's (or reviewers') taste and lose potential sales. Since you have your own style and expectations as to what fiction should read like, you're not unbiased. By leaving a low rating, you're not helping your reputation in the writing community either because people will start talking about you, and certainly not in glowing terms.

Sometimes silence is worth more than gold!

To your publishing success!

Friday, 24 June 2011

New release promotion

To celebrate the imminent release of BEELZEBUB GIRL: Dating a demon, everyone buying a print copy of A Job From Hell will receive $2 off. Just go to


and enter discount code 9MCLN86T

Best,

Jayde


Wednesday, 22 June 2011

A Job From Hell at ataleofmanyreviews.blogspot.com

Check out what the lovely ladies at ataleofmanyreviews.blogspot.com have to say about A Job From Hell:


Thank you so much to Leisha for taking the time to read and review my book. Also a huge thank you to Julie for the helpful emails and kind words. These ladies rock!

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

A Job From Hell on thefirstgates.com

A Job From Hell has just received a wonderful review from the lovely Morgan Mussell. I was very nervous to send Morgan my book, not least because he's a highly creative individual with a sharp mind and a talent for words (head over and see for yourself). I feel honoured and blessed that someone I highly respect, someone who writes the most articulate reviews ever, read my book.

http://thefirstgates.com/2011/05/25/a-job-from-hell-by-jayde-scott-book-review/

Thank you so much, Morgan.

Thursday, 19 May 2011

A Job From Hell on Love Fantasy Sci-Fi Novels

A Job from Hell has just been mentioned on Love Fantasy Sci-Fi novels. I love that blog, so it's such an honour!!!

Check it out:


Thank you so much to Siobhán, who is as beautiful as her name is!

Sunday, 8 May 2011

A Job From Hell featured on Indie eBooks

Hey everyone,

Just a quick note to let you know A Job From Hell has been featured on Indie eBooks along my very first interview as a fiction author. How awesome is that? Check it out and please subscribe to Nadine's blog:

Thursday, 5 May 2011

A Job From Hell - Available on Kindle for only $0.99/£0.70

To celebrate the imminent launch of BEELZEBUB GIRL, the second book in the Ancient Legends series, I've lowered the price of A JOB FROM HELL to $0.99/£0.99.

If you want a lovely paranormal romance with lots of kick-ass action, hot guys and plenty of humour, please go to Amazon and get it now.

Jayde

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

A Job From Hell - Please help spread the word

Please check out and help spread the word about my new novel, A JOB FROM HELL, available on Kindle and Smashwords, and soon in paperback.

The moment Amber starts her new summer job in Scotland and sets eyes upon Aidan, her fate is sealed. Summoned by an ancient bond, she can never love another.
Lost in the woods one night, Amber enters Aidan's deadly world by chance when she unknowingly participates in a paranormal race, and promptly wins the first prize - a prize worth killing for.
In a world of forbidden love, of ancient enemies, legends and rituals, nothing is as it seems and no one can be trusted. Amber's life will never be the same again, unless she searches the Otherworld for what everyone wants. But to do so, Amber must die.

A JOB FROM HELL is the stunning first book in the paranormal series, Ancient Legends.

Thanks so much,

Jayde

Friday, 1 April 2011

Seven reasons why you may decide not to self publish

Recently, a string of authors, including the big name Barry Eisler, have gone on to turn their backs on the traditional publishing route and self-publish, sparkling plenty of discussions and divided opinions in the author community. We don't know where publishing will be in two, five or ten years. All we know is that the publishing world is changing; with Kindle, Sony, Nook etc. more and more authors realise they can reach their target audience by going indie, without having to wait months and years on agents and publishers. While not everyone's Amanda Hocking, making millions in the process (I know I'm not, not sure about you!), it's not just about making money, but more about seeing one's work read and hopefully enjoyed by others.
Of course there's the stigma of publishing: that a book's not good enough to be picked up by a traditional publisher, that it might be riddled with grammar and spelling mistakes, etc., but like prejudice goes, it's usually based on a few bad examples rather than on the majority.
I call self-publishing 'author self-impowerment' because it gives authors full control over their book and whatever happens with it, such as what to write, how many books to write in a series and, my favourite activity of all times, cover design. Hence, I'm all for it if your book's gone through enough editing and you have given thought to the seven points raised below.

Read my favourite seven points to consider before you take the leap and self-publish:
  • you expect to make millions in the process. As said, most writers will never reach Amanda Hocking's status. This certainly applies to both self- and traditional publishing. Some make it, others don't. Unfortunately, that's the reality.
  • you're a recluse and don't enjoy human contact, not even the virtual one like social media. In that case, you're better off locking the manuscript away forever because in our world there's no way you won't have to communicate with fans and those yet to become at some point.
  • you're not prepared to listen to audience taste. You don't need to waste your time trying your hand at steampunk and YA vampire romances when you'd rather write futuristic thrillers, but it might be worth looking at some aspects of what is popular nowadays and find a way to bring your knowledge and research into your preferred genre to give it a modern or unique twist.
  • you have nothing unique to say. This one ties in with the point previously made. Readers are spoilt for choice. Since almost everything's been done already, if you can't come up with a new twist, your books might never really take off and find worldwide appeal.
  • you don't mind waiting. As in, you don't mind waiting to hear back from agents' assistants, agents, a publisher's editor, then the editor-in-chief. It could take years. Life's too short not to take your own future in your own hands. This doesn't mean you shouldn't try the traditional publishing route. But I've talked to authors who built a platform first and then were approached by agents/publishers rather than spend their valuable time trying to persuade someone else of how much potential their novels had.
  • you're not prepared to spend forty hours a week marketing your work. As much as I'd like to pretend otherwise, even traditionally published authors spend more time engaged in promotional activities than they spend on writing. So, learning about marketing and PR comes with the job, really.
  • you can't take criticism. And there's going to be lots of it in the form of bad reviews, comparing your work to those of others, etc. Writing a book is highly intimate. By putting your work out there, you make yourself vulnerable to others belittling your work, talent, and so forth. Don't forget it's a job. Customers pay for your novel, so they're entitled to say whatever they want. Of course, we all wish they could play nice and fair, but life doesn't always work like that. If you can't grow a thick skin, then you're better off never showing your work to anyone, not even to friends and family.
To your publishing success!

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Writing without distractions

I don't know about you, but whenever I write I'm never quite able to switch off that tiny voice at the back of my mind reminding me of the countless other (often trivial) things I could be doing instead. And so I end up, taking 'breaks' during which I chat, compulsively check my eMails, surf Amazon, Barnes and Noble, etc., which cuts into my productivity. Don't get me wrong, I adore writing, but the Internet is a fine and highly addictive invention even the best of us can't resist. Luckily, my search for ways to keep me from switching on my airport and checking Hotmail yet again has helped me find great software to aid a writer in resisting the near constant stream of virtual distraction. The software mentioned below is simple with the sole intention of providing a black screen so you can get on with your writing, and nothing else.

OMMwriter is a MAC program that simply takes over the entire monitor and furnishes a minimalistic, zen-like environment. This one's really helped me focus for several weeks now.

Dark Room is the Windows equivalent, running on Win 2000 through Vista. With its simple black screen, it's less chic than OMMwriter, but it does a great job at being about just you and your text.

Finally, there's RubyRoom with a few more additions. All three software programs come with word counters, but in RubyRoom the user can't switch it off, so if that feature's yet another distraction, then you're probably better off using one of the other options. You should also have basic Linux knowledge before diving into this one.

If you have any suggestions, please free to share your recommendations.

To your publishing success!

Note: I consciously decided not to mention any download links. The software mentioned above is available for free on the Internet. Before downloading .exe or .zip files always make sure your anti-virus software is up to date. Please scan the files before you install them. If in doubt, always back up any important files before installing anything downloaded from the Internet.

Sunday, 13 March 2011

Review sites worth considering

Most authors, whether self- or traditionally published, will have to spread the word about their book at the beginning of their career. Searching the internet for review sites can take a long time. To save you time, I've put together a list with a few sites that should get you started and keep you busy for a few days. You won't be able to get your book featured in each and every one of those, but a few good reviews should spark some major interest in what you have to sell.

Mysteries:Poetry:Romance and women's fiction (including paranormal lit):Science fiction and fantasy:

Please do your research and read the fine print before submitting to any of these sites as I can't guarantee they're all free. To your publishing success!

Monday, 10 January 2011

Interviews - when writers have nothing to say

Ask me about my books and I could talk for hours, but me as a writer, ah, not so much. In a recent interview I realised as an author I have nothing new or insightful to add about me or my profession. Not because I'm a boring or monosyllabic person; in fact, my friends keep telling me I'm quite the chatty type, sometimes even too chatty which has helped in my career as a freelance PR professional. It's just that it's hard to talk about something I don't actually over-analyse which is why I thought giving the answers I did was fine until I read the interview and realised it wasn't the best I ever gave. Had I babbled like that in a press conference or at the launch of a new product, my employer would've seriously considered sacking me.

So, why is it that we have nothing interesting to say about ourselves or our profession? After musing for a few days, I've come to the conclusion that I haven't really thought about my image and what I'm supposed to convey. A writer's a bit like an actor; we need to prepare ourselves in order to appear mysterious yet approachable, insightful yet modest, but in no way mundane.
Don't pretend to be someone you're not because people will see right through it. Just research your personality like a good PR manager would research a brand and focus on the interesting traits that help you stand out from the crowd. If you're funny, then by all means go on and build your image around this part of your character and your audience will come to acknowledge you for your humour. If you're super-clever and articulate, then that's what you should focus on. It may not make what you have to say more interesting, but people will start to see the personality behind it, and in our competitive world seeing a human side behind a brand or product is what can make a difference whether your audience starts to like you and buys your books. Decide on an image and keep it consistent as you build it, and your audience will start to perceive you as someone they 'know'. That's one of the tricks to branding: connect to your audience in a way that truly reflects who you are. Put your character behind your words and whatever you say will suddenly appear to have more depth even if it's all been said before.

To your publishing success!

Friday, 7 January 2011

How to handle rejection letters

After writing five books, I've seen my fair share of rejection letters from publishers. I'm still not as thick-skinned as I'd like to be, but I've learned enough about the publishing business to know rejection letters from agents or editors don't mean a thing. Usually, that is, unless it's a rejection on a full which is likely to send anyone into sulking mode for at least a few hours.
It doesn't matter how commercial or unique your work is, let's face it, you're unknown and unpublished (Kindle doesn't count) so most people won't even look at your query, let alone go to all that trouble of reading the pasted sample. Hence, in most cases, the rejection will be based on your query letter or, worse, on genre/word count/the agent not being open to submissions at all. That's one of the reasons why you shouldn't take rejection letters personally, but here's a few more:

1. Agents don't usually mean to belittle writers because they're professional. Hence, even if an agent tells you they wouldn't know how to sell your work, it doesn't mean your work's that bad but rather that they don't have the necessary contacts (i.e., editors) to whom to talk about your work.

2. Every published author has been rejected at some point. Even the big names like JK Rowling, Anne Rice, Stephen King. Yes, all of them, and if you don't believe me, then by all means go on and do a Google search. So, you see, rejection isn't necessarily a reflection of how bad your work is. It's simply a matter of taste, time, risk, being unknown, living in the wrong part of the world etc.

3. 'This isn't right for us' means exactly that. You may have submitted the right genre, but the agent may not connect with the work. Remember, taste is relative, particularly when it comes to humour and style. So, be grateful for the answer since it's become common practice not to give any answer at all, and move on to the next bunch. You wouldn't want to be represented by someone who isn't fully committed to your work anyway because your project deserves the best attention it can receive.

4. Perhaps you weren't convincing enough in your query letter? If the rejection letters keep flooding in, don't hesitate to take another look at your query letter. The culprit might be right there.

Even if no one shows any interest in your book, don't give up because there's more to publishing than finding an agent or publisher. Work on building an audience platform for your next book and keep writing. Sooner or later, you will get noticed.

To your publishing success!

Friday, 24 December 2010

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Wishing you a magical time wherever you are, one that is filled with joy, love, laughter, abundance and sharing.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Jayde

Friday, 10 December 2010

Alex Gonzo, Royal Spy is out

I'm thrilled to announce the launch of ALEX GONZO, ROYAL SPY on Kindle and Smashwords, and hopefully soon in hardcopy. Getting this book to readers has been an incredibly long but fulfilling process. I loved every single moment of it.
I hope you'll enjoy the book just as much as I enjoyed writing it. If you do, don't forget to leave a review or comment. Thank you so much.

Where to buy ALEX GONZO, ROYAL SPY:

Smashwords (For Sony readers, iPad and many other formats)

Monday, 6 December 2010

Worth it

I have to admit, it's been a while since I last made a blog post. Not because I didn't want to, I just couldn't stop thinking that it might not be worth it. Don't get me wrong, I have a few regular blog and feed subscribers, but apart from those, writers out there just don't seem that interested in learning new ways to promote their work. However, this morning, I woke up to a message from my friend Mike who's a gifted fellow writer. He said keeping this blog is all worth it, and then it dawned on me. It's not about reaching thousands of people and helping them gain the knowledge they need to market their books; it's about reaching out to those who seek that knowledge and want to implement it. It may just be a handful of people, but they're the kind that don't shy away from putting in the necessary work to get their books out there.
Starting this month, I'll be featuring self-published authors in a sidebar on this blog. If you're interested in cross-marketing, drop me a line and I'll get in touch with you to discuss how to get mentioned on this site (for free, obviously).

To your publishing success!

Sunday, 24 October 2010

A writer's pitfalls

Any writer, whether new or experienced, will know that it's easy to become discouraged as they go through the motions or writing a novel. Often it's not writer's block or a lack in plot/character development that makes a writer want to give up, but what they do and don't do as they write. Here's my Top 4 pitfalls that may keep you from finishing that novel:

1. Going back and forth between tweaking and rewriting

Especially in the early stages of narrative a writer will be temped to start editing which will increase the pressure and will make it hard for any writer to get past the opening chapters. No matter how much you may feel tempted to revise while the book's not finished, stay away from it because it's too early to decide whether the pacing is right, a character has enough prominence etc.

2. Rereading

I don't know about you but I keep rereading the first chapters of a new novel. Even though I don't necessarily tweak and edit at this point, rereading is just as bad because it clouds one's judgement due to the work seeming over-familiar and makes one focus on the flaws rather than the good points. That can prove just as discouraging.

3. Being over-critical

Rereading is necessary, particularly to remind the reader where they left off. In such a case, it's important to avoid being over-critical due to outside influences such as having had a bad day or lack of work motivation. Don't become jaded just because you're tired and feeling low; only reread when you're enthusiastic and feel positive.

4. Don't show your work to lots of people

This is probably my favourite tip because it's one mistake many writers make. Getting feedback might seem like a good idea, but receiving conflicting advice and opinions will only frustrate you and make the book idea less appealing to you. At this point in the writing process you need to keep a clear head, a definite vision and a high enthusiasm.

To your publishing success!



Friday, 30 July 2010

Editing 101: Formatting your manuscript

So you've finished writing and have edited for style and mechanics as discussed in previous posts, not it's time to format your manuscript before sending it off to agents and publishers. Formatting requests can vary from publisher to publisher so it's always worth checking submission guidelines. Follow the points below and you can't go wrong:

  • use paragraph styles (not spaces or tabs) to indent your paragraphs; every word processor will have paragraph styles so establishing your required settings once will apply to the entire manuscript
  • don't use fancy fonts; most publishing houses will prefer Times New Roman size 12
  • use italics only to place emphasis on a particular word to give that word or sentence a certain meaning. In some books, italics are used for thoughts, but if you have plenty of thoughts you may want to reconsider using italics as it may distract the reader
  • use ellipses or the em dash when trailing off or when there's a pause in speech such as someone interrupting
  • make sure there's only one space between words and after end punctuation
  • use quotation marks for direct speech
  • generally, manuscripts should be double-spaced with every new chapter starting on a new page. Don't forget to include your surname and the name of the book in the header and page numbers in the footer
To your publishing success!

Thursday, 29 July 2010

Editing 101 for Self-editing Fiction: Mechanics Part 2

Last time I discussed the importance of spelling and fact-checking your writing, today I'm looking at grammar and word usage. While spelling and grammar may differ from country to country (I admit US comma usage is way beyond me), you need to know the basics. As a writer, you should have at least one grammar book and one dictionary/thesaurus available to you at all times, either as a book, computer software or you should be able to access the information you need online.
Another two points to look for when editing your book for Mechanics:

Grammar
As a writer you know what grammar is, but are you fully aware of all grammar rules and exceptions? Reading a grammar book once in a while to refresh your knowledge will help. Generally, make sure
  • subjects and verbs are in agreement with respect to number and person
  • you don't have any displaced or dangling modifiers
  • you've used apostrophes correctly to indicate possession and elision
  • you haven't used 'of' instead of 'have' in 'would/could/should have' - this may sound obvious, but many writers make this mistake
  • you use commas correctly; now this is a tricky one because comma use in the UK varies from that in the US. Just make sure your usage of commas is the right one for your spelling, don't mix 'n match
  • you keep away from hypercorrection and stilted constructions where they don't suit the situation, tone, character etc.
Usage
  • make sure you've used 'that' for restrictive clauses and 'which' for non-restrictive ones (unless your spelling is British English)
  • don't confuse verbs, e.g. lie and lay
  • dont' use ambiguous pronouns or pronouns without antecedents
  • begin subordinate clauses with 'that' whenever necessary
  • don't qualify absolutes such as impossible
Should you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask in the comment box below.
Next time: How to format your manuscript

To your publishing success!

Thursday, 8 July 2010

Editing 101 for Self-editing Fiction: Mechanics Part 1

So you've finished editing for Style and now you're ready to dig deeper than sentence structure and variation. Readers nowadays rarely take what they read at face value, which is why editing for Mechanics is so important. A book may be written well in a voice and style that appeals to a broad audience, but with information available at the click of a mouse a writer has to have his facts straight. Otherwise bad things happen such as nasty reviews that damage one's reputation and credibility as a writer.
This is what to look for in no particular order:

Spelling
  • Don't ever rely on your PC's spellchecker, invest in a good dictionary. It doesn't have to be a heavy, bound book. I love my MacBook's dictionary and thesaurus because it doesn't clutter my desk. Also, always read your chapters paying attention to each word, and when you're finished, do it again to catch any spelling mistakes that you may oversee the first time.
  • Be consistent in your spelling. If you write for a British audience, use British spelling. There's nothing wrong with sending manuscripts with British spelling to US publishers and agents as long as the spelling is consistent and you don't jump back and forth between British and American spelling.
  • As a rule: look up every word you're not sure of. Don't pick synonyms just to ensure you don't repeat words without researching their proper usage because a synonym can't always be used in the same context.
Facts
  • Always check your facts: names, places, titles, works of art, events, anything related to history, geographical details, anything related to nature such as flora and fauna, physical possibilities, travel times, street names etc. Never assume the reader won't know anyway because many readers are more critical than the writer. Reviewers often do their research, and as a writer you don't want to come across as too lazy to invest a bit of time to get your facts straight.
  • Quote material properly (if applicable); if you use anything from other people's work never ever forget to mention it otherwise you risk being accused of plagiarism.
Next time: Editing for Mechanics Part 2

To your publishing success!